Islam, Rafikul (2018) Comparison of outcomes obtained from nominal group technique and survey method: An empirical investigation. Journal for Global Business Advancement, 11 (2). pp. 232-259. ISSN 1746-966X E-ISSN 1746-9678
PDF
- Published Version
Restricted to Repository staff only Download (343kB) | Request a copy |
|
PDF (SCOPUS)
- Supplemental Material
Restricted to Registered users only Download (41kB) | Request a copy |
Abstract
Nominal group technique (NGT) is a method wherein brainstorming is used to generate ideas in large number on a certain issue. Afterwards, the ideas are prioritized by using a suitable voting scheme. The result of a nominal group (NG) session is basically a hierarchical list of ideas. The number of participants of a NG session normally ranges from six to ten people. Together they make the hierarchical list of ideas through voting. The objective of the present research is to examine the difference, if any, between the results obtained from a NG session and a succeeding follow-up survey. The results from two experiments suggest a close association between the ranks of ideas obtained from NGT and survey method. The findings of the present research emphasise the effectiveness of NGT in terms of idea generation and reliability of ranking of ideas.
Item Type: | Article (Journal) |
---|---|
Additional Information: | 2887/66827 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Nominal group technique; Survey method; Qualities of a manager; Location selection for global business |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HF Commerce > HF5001 Business. Business Administration |
Kulliyyahs/Centres/Divisions/Institutes (Can select more than one option. Press CONTROL button): | Kulliyyah of Economics and Management Sciences Kulliyyah of Economics and Management Sciences > Department of Business Administration |
Depositing User: | Rafikul Islam |
Date Deposited: | 22 Oct 2018 11:42 |
Last Modified: | 22 Oct 2018 11:42 |
URI: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/id/eprint/66827 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |