Gunawan, Teddy Surya and Kartiwi, Mira (2026) Compute-aware evaluation of severity conditioning and lightweight architectures for real-world image deraining. IIUM Engineering Journal, 27 (3). pp. 319-339. ISSN 1511-788X E-ISSN 2289-7860
|
PDF
- Published Version
Restricted to Registered users only Download (8MB) | Request a copy |
||
|
PDF
- Supplemental Material
Download (479kB) | Preview |
|
|
PDF
- Supplemental Material
Download (220kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Image deraining for embedded perception must balance restoration quality against complete inference cost. Yet density-conditioned methods require annotations unavailable for captured rain, while efficiency studies often omit conditioning-signal cost. This study examines whether label-free severity conditioning justifies its end-to-end cost and whether complexity measures predict realized latency. Under a common L1 protocol, we compare a PReNet baseline with scalar feature-wise linear modulation, spatial severity modulation (SSM), a matched-capacity constant-map control, and two lightweight architectures. Zero-, shuffled-, and constant-prior interventions test SSM’s dependence on prior presence, image correspondence, and spatial structure. Six models were trained for 100 epochs on 10,000 LHP-Rain patches using three seeds and evaluated on the 1,000-image test split. SSM achieved 31.775±0.109 dB, compared with 31.741±0.095 dB for Base and 31.754±0.102 dB under zero-prior replacement. A seed-level equivalence analysis based on paired image differences supported practical equivalence between SSM and Base (95% CI: ?0.026 to 0.094 dB; margin fixed before primary analysis: ±0.1 dB), consistent with the half-scale experiment. The two-stage model reduced computation from 265.0 to 44.6 GFLOPs and model latency from 20.43 to 4.50 ms, but the prior generation increased total latency to 24.74 ms. CBAM-light required 14.1 GFLOPs yet recorded 33.68 ms. The label-free statistic achieved a cross-scene AUC of 0.772 on RealRain-1k, indicating moderate agreement with density labels. Thus, severity-conditioned and lightweight deraining systems should be assessed through verified prior use and measured end-to-end latency rather than accuracy, parameters, or GFLOPs alone.
| Item Type: | Article (Journal) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Image Deraining, Severity Conditioning, Lightweight Architecture, End-to-End Latency, Real-World Rain |
| Subjects: | T Technology > TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering > TK7800 Electronics. Computer engineering. Computer hardware. Photoelectronic devices > TK7885 Computer engineering |
| Kulliyyahs/Centres/Divisions/Institutes (Can select more than one option. Press CONTROL button): | Kulliyyah of Engineering > Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Kulliyyah of Information and Communication Technology > Department of Information System Kulliyyah of Information and Communication Technology > Department of Information System |
| Depositing User: | Prof. Dr. Teddy Surya Gunawan |
| Date Deposited: | 28 Sep 2026 14:40 |
| Last Update: | 28 Sep 2026 14:40 |
| Queue Number: | 2026-09-Q5298 |
| URI: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/id/eprint/131545 |
| Indexed In: | WOS and SCOPUS, ERA, Google Scholar, MyCite |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |
