Mohd. Sulaiman, Aiman @ Nariman and Hingun, Mohsin (2017) When arbitration clause and oppression claim collide. Commonweallth Law Bulletin, 43 (1). pp. 33-47. ISSN 0305-0718 E-ISSN 1750-5976
PDF
- Published Version
Restricted to Registered users only Download (439kB) | Request a copy |
|
PDF (SCOPUS)
- Supplemental Material
Restricted to Registered users only Download (30kB) | Request a copy |
Abstract
The question regarding the position of arbitration clauses within the context of shareholders’ protection under company law rules has been dealt with in a decision from the United Kingdom, Exeter, which upheld the inalienable right of the members to bring an oppression claim despite the presence of an arbitration agreement. The issue was recently revisited in several common law jurisdictions – United Kingdom, Malaysia, Singapore and Hong Kong with mixed results. The article discusses this development to clarify the scope, breadth and limits of the arbitration clause within company law.
Item Type: | Article (Journal) |
---|---|
Additional Information: | 1872/59230 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | arbitration clause, oppression claim |
Subjects: | K Law > KPG Malaysia |
Kulliyyahs/Centres/Divisions/Institutes (Can select more than one option. Press CONTROL button): | Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Laws > Department of Civil Law |
Depositing User: | Prof Aiman Nariman Mohd-Sulaiman |
Date Deposited: | 10 Nov 2017 09:23 |
Last Modified: | 14 Aug 2018 10:08 |
URI: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/id/eprint/59230 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |