Mediation v. sulh: A comparative study

Mohd Zaki, Mohammad Hafiz and Termizi, Mazbah and Saleh, Muhammad Ridhwan and Mohd Din, Nina Syazmeen and Abu Hasan, Siti Farhana (2017) Mediation v. sulh: A comparative study. In: International Conference on Dispute Resolution 2017 (ICDR 2017), 9th-10th August 2017, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

PDF - Published Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (591kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

One of the functions of law is for the settlement of dispute which led to the development of mediation and sulh in alternative dispute resolution (ADR) process. Mediation is a process whereby both parties intend to reach consensus in resolving a dispute through an agreement between the parties whereby mediator become an assistance in terms of communication and negotiation. Meanwhile, sulh can be defined as a harmonise way to settle dispute between the parties which consists of negotiation, mediation, conciliation and compromise of action. There are some similarities and differences between mediation and sulh that can be seen from the perspective of its legality, types of dispute, as well as their process and outcome. The advantages of mediation and sulh are clear in the dispute resolution. Therefore, this paper seeks to study the similarities and differences between mediation and sulh by comparing them from various perspectives.

Item Type:	Conference or Workshop Item (Plenary Papers)
Additional Information:	5629/57945
Uncontrolled Keywords:	mediation, sulh, comparative study
Subjects:	K Law > K Law (General)
Kulliyyahs/Centres/Divisions/Institutes (Can select more than one option. Press CONTROL button):	Centre for Foundation Studies
Depositing User:	Dr. Mazbah Termizi
Date Deposited:	17 Aug 2017 09:59
Last Modified:	12 Dec 2017 14:32
URI:	http://irep.iium.edu.my/id/eprint/57945

Actions (login required)

View Item