Nik Idris, Nik Ruzni and Saidin, Norraida (2011) An empirical comparison of meta analysis models for continuous data with missing standard deviations. InterStat. ISSN 1941-689X
PDF (An empirical comparison of meta analysis models for continuous data with missing standard deviations)
- Published Version
Restricted to Repository staff only Download (295kB) | Request a copy |
Abstract
Abstract: The choice between the Fixed and Random Effects models for providing an overall meta analysis estimates may affect the accuracy of those estimates. When the study-level standard deviations (SDs) are not completely reported or are “missing” selection of a meta analysis model should be done with more caution. In this article, we examine through a simulation study, the effects of the choice of meta analysis model and the techniques of imputation of the missing SDs on the overall meta analysis estimates. The results suggest that imputation should be adopted to estimate the overall effect size, irrespective of the model used. However, the accuracy of the estimates of the corresponding standard error (SE) are influenced by the imputation techniques. For estimates based on the Fixed Effect model, mean imputation provides better estimates than multiple imputation, while those based on the Random Effects model are the more robust of the techniques imputation used
Item Type: | Article (Journal) |
---|---|
Additional Information: | 4059/5544 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | meta analysis, fixed effect model, random effect model, missing SDs, imputation techniques 2000 MSC Codes : 00A72, 81T80, 62P10, 62P25, |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HA Statistics |
Kulliyyahs/Centres/Divisions/Institutes (Can select more than one option. Press CONTROL button): | Kulliyyah of Science > Department of Computational and Theoretical Sciences |
Depositing User: | Dr Nik Ruzni Nik Idris |
Date Deposited: | 30 Oct 2011 15:48 |
Last Modified: | 22 Nov 2011 08:40 |
URI: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/id/eprint/5544 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |