IIUM Repository (IREP)

Dissenting opinion: The voice of the future

Ali Mohamed, Ashgar Ali (2016) Dissenting opinion: The voice of the future. Malayan Law Journal, 2016 (4 (July-August)). lxxiii-lxxxiii. ISSN 0025-1283

[img] PDF - Published Version
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (1MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

This article deals with the legal point of view of the dissenting opinion with reference to the recent Federal Court's split 3-2 ruling in Majlis Agama Islam Wilayah Persekutuan & Anor v Victoria Jayaseele Martin. The dissenting opinion which had subsequently changed the legal doctrine or position is discussed with reference to the New Zealand Court of Appeal's decision in Brighouse Ltd v Bilderbeck. The minority decision in Brighouse Ltd's case was followed in Aoraki Corporation Ltd v McGavin, a decision of the Court of Appeal comprising a panel of seven judges.

Item Type: Article (Journal)
Additional Information: 2924/52653
Uncontrolled Keywords: dissenting opinion
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Kulliyyahs/Centres/Divisions/Institutes: Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Laws > Department of Civil Law
Depositing User: Dr Ashgar Ali Ali Mohamed
Date Deposited: 23 Nov 2016 09:18
Last Modified: 23 Nov 2016 15:51
URI: http://irep.iium.edu.my/id/eprint/52653

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year