Ali Mohamed, Ashgar Ali (2016) Dissenting opinion: The voice of the future. Malayan Law Journal, 2016 (4 (July-August)). lxxiii-lxxxiii. ISSN 0025-1283
PDF
- Published Version
Restricted to Repository staff only Download (1MB) | Request a copy |
Abstract
This article deals with the legal point of view of the dissenting opinion with reference to the recent Federal Court's split 3-2 ruling in Majlis Agama Islam Wilayah Persekutuan & Anor v Victoria Jayaseele Martin. The dissenting opinion which had subsequently changed the legal doctrine or position is discussed with reference to the New Zealand Court of Appeal's decision in Brighouse Ltd v Bilderbeck. The minority decision in Brighouse Ltd's case was followed in Aoraki Corporation Ltd v McGavin, a decision of the Court of Appeal comprising a panel of seven judges.
Item Type: | Article (Journal) |
---|---|
Additional Information: | 2924/52653 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | dissenting opinion |
Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) |
Kulliyyahs/Centres/Divisions/Institutes (Can select more than one option. Press CONTROL button): | Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Laws > Department of Civil Law |
Depositing User: | Dr Ashgar Ali Ali Mohamed |
Date Deposited: | 23 Nov 2016 09:18 |
Last Modified: | 23 Nov 2016 15:51 |
URI: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/id/eprint/52653 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |