This article first appeared in Forum, The Edge Malaysia Weekly on September 23, 2024 - September 29, 2024

The recently announced Public-Private Partnership (PPP) Master Plan 2030 (Pikas 2030) marks a pivotal moment in Malaysia’s economic development strategy, aiming to harness the collaborative potential of the public and private sectors. With goals to elevate private investments, increase employment opportunities and accelerate gross domestic product contributions by 2030, the master plan represents a significant step forward.

However, this raises important questions. What are the innovations introduced by the master plan? What are its potential drawbacks? And how can it be further improved to ensure the achievement of its ambitious targets?

The master plan introduces comprehensive reforms across five strategic pillars: policy; governance and process; strategy; finance; and human capital. It is structured around four strategic thrusts and 17 strategic initiatives aimed at improving the PPP ecosystem, centralising coordination, expanding PPP models and enhancing financing mechanisms.

The PPP Master Plan 2030 is aligned with various national policies and plans, such as the 12th Malaysia Plan, Malaysia Madani, and the Sustainable Development Goals. It emphasises a private sector-driven approach, quality service delivery, innovation, efficiency and national benefits.

In sum, the document reflects the country’s commitment to leveraging PPPs as a strategic tool for national development, with a clear vision and structured approach to achieving its goals by 2030.

Innovation #1: A refined policy framework

The policy pillar emphasises the establishment of a coherent and well-defined policy environment. The master plan calls for the redefinition of PPP implementation aspects to align with future economic and social goals. It stresses the need for clear demarcation of stakeholder roles and responsibilities, which is crucial for ensuring transparency and reducing post-signing risks.

Additionally, the plan proposes expanding PPP sectors to include tourism infrastructure, renewable energy, smart agriculture and science and technology. These sectors have been relatively untapped in the country’s PPP landscape, presenting new opportunities for growth and development.

Innovation #2: Governance and process: Enhancing efficiency and accountability

The governance and process pillar advocates for a centralised planning approach coupled with decentralised implementation. This model aims to streamline project planning while allowing for flexible execution at various administrative levels.

A notable innovation is the proposed single-window system, designed to simplify national development planning and enhance project transparency.

Moreover, the introduction of big data architecture for monitoring PPP projects represents a significant step towards improved oversight and accountability.

These measures, coupled with increased capacity building and the promotion of a PPP Centre of Excellence (CoE), are set to elevate the efficiency and governance standards of PPP projects.

Innovation #3: Strategic expansion and innovation

The strategy pillar emphasises the importance of aligning PPP projects with national priorities. The master plan identifies sectors such as higher education, healthcare facilities, military infrastructure and transport as critical areas for PPP expansion.

This sectoral diversification aims to foster holistic national development and ensure that PPP projects contribute meaningfully to Malaysia’s socioeconomic landscape.

The plan also encourages the adoption of innovative models, including Public-Private-Philanthropy Partnerships (PPPPs), which integrate philanthropic contributions into public projects. This approach not only broadens the funding base but also promotes inclusivity and sustainability.

Innovation #4: Financial mechanisms and risk management

The finance pillar focuses on establishing balanced financial frameworks that safeguard public interests while encouraging private sector investment. It emphasises the need for comprehensive financial feasibility studies, affordability assessments, and the careful structuring of project proposals.

The introduction of equitable financing solutions, such as green bonds and sukuk, reflects Malaysia’s commitment to sustainable development. Furthermore, the plan seeks to improve access to international development assistance, which could provide crucial support for PPP projects, particularly during economic downturns.

Innovation #5: Building human capital for the future

Recognising the importance of skilled human resources, the human capital pillar aims to enhance the expertise of government officials and other stakeholders involved in PPP projects.

The plan outlines initiatives for continuous professional development, leveraging private sector expertise, and establishing centres of excellence. These efforts are vital for ensuring effective project management and oversight, as well as for fostering a culture of innovation and best practices within the public sector.

Overall, the master plan outlines a comprehensive and forward-thinking framework for PPPs in Malaysia, attempting to distinguish it from many other countries.

While the PPP Master Plan 2030 offers a strong framework for advancing the country’s PPP ecosystem, it may have several limitations:

1. Complex and bureaucratic processes

Despite efforts to streamline workflow, the plan’s requirement for comprehensive feasibility studies and stringent evaluation criteria may slow down the project approval and implementation process. This complexity could deter private sector participation, especially for smaller or less experienced firms.

To address this, procedural requirements could be simplified by establishing clear, step-by-step guidelines for project proposals and approvals. A fast-track system for projects with high socioeconomic impact might also be beneficial.

Additionally, implementing digital tools and platforms for online submissions, real-time tracking and automated processing can reduce manual bottlenecks.

2. Risk of inadequate funding

The plan emphasises diversified financing mechanisms, including the establishment of the PPP Guarantee Fund. However, concerns remain about whether these mechanisms will be sufficient to cover the wide range of proposed projects, especially in the face of economic fluctuations or unforeseen financial constraints.

Expanding funding options by exploring alternative mechanisms such as green bonds, sukuk and public equity markets could help mitigate these concerns. Encouraging the involvement of international development banks and private equity funds may also be a viable approach.

Moreover, co-funding arrangements, where the government provides partial funding, could derisk projects, making them more attractive to private investors.

3. Limited scope of sectors

While the plan aims to expand PPP projects into new sectors, there is still a notable focus on traditional infrastructure projects like transport and utilities. This limitation may not fully exploit the potential of PPPs in other areas such as healthcare, education or digital infrastructure, thereby limiting the broader impact on national development.

To broaden the scope, feasibility studies can identify viable PPP opportunities in underexplored sectors like healthcare, education, digital infrastructure and social services. Promoting pilot projects in these areas could demonstrate success and encourage broader adoption.

Additionally, offering incentives such as tax breaks, grants or subsidies to private companies proposing innovative solutions in non-traditional PPP sectors could stimulate interest and investment.

4. Challenges in governance and accountability

Although the plan outlines measures to improve governance, including the demarcation of roles and transparent bidding processes, there remains a risk of inadequate oversight and accountability. This can lead to inefficiencies, corruption or misallocation of resources, particularly in high-value projects.

Enhancing governance could involve establishing an independent regulatory body tasked with monitoring PPP projects, ensuring compliance with standards and conducting audits. Regular public reporting on project status and outcomes could further enhance transparency. Additionally, training and empowering local governance structures to manage and oversee PPP projects effectively would ensure localised accountability.

5. Potential for market monopolies

The emphasis on reducing direct negotiations and increasing competitive bidding is intended to enhance transparency. However, exceptions allowed for projects with public or national interest might still enable monopolistic practices or favouritism, potentially stifling competition and innovation.

To counter this, strengthening the competitive bidding process by setting strict criteria for project awards and minimising exceptions for direct negotiations is crucial. Transparent evaluation criteria and public disclosure of bid results should be standard practice.

Furthermore, implementing regulatory measures to prevent monopolistic practices and ensure fair competition, along with monitoring market conditions, could help maintain a competitive landscape.

6. Human capital constraints

The plan acknowledges the need for competent and knowledgeable government officials to manage PPP initiatives. However, there may be challenges in building this capacity, particularly in specialised areas such as financial modelling, risk assessment and project management. This skill gap could hinder effective implementation and oversight of PPP projects.

To overcome this, developing specialised training programmes in partnership with academic institutions and private companies, international organisations can build expertise in critical areas. Policies aimed at retaining skilled professionals within the public sector, such as offering competitive salaries and career development opportunities, will also be essential. Promoting the benefits of public service and the opportunity for impactful work can attract talent.

7. Economic and social impact concerns

While the plan aims for a balanced economic impact, the focus on large-scale infrastructure projects may lead to uneven development, favouring urban areas over rural ones. Additionally, the plan’s reliance on private sector investment raises concerns about ensuring equitable access to public services, as profit motives might overshadow public welfare objectives.

To promote balanced regional development, quotas or targets for rural development could ensure equitable distribution of PPP projects. Incentives for projects that address regional disparities may also help.

A framework prioritising public welfare in PPP projects is essential, incorporating social impact assessments into project evaluations to ensure that they serve the broader public interest rather than focusing solely on profitability.

The PPP Master Plan 2030 represents a forward-thinking blueprint for Malaysia’s development. By addressing existing gaps and introducing innovative strategies, the plan aims to create a vibrant and sustainable PPP environment. As the country embarks on this ambitious journey, the successful implementation of the master plan will be crucial in achieving the country’s broader economic and social objectives, ultimately contributing to a more prosperous and equitable future of Malaysia Madani.

Suhaiza Ismail ([email protected]) is a professor at the Department of Accounting, Kulliyyah of Economics and Management Sciences, International Islamic University Malaysia

Save by subscribing to us for your print and/or digital copy.

P/S: The Edge is also available on Apple's App Store and Android's Google Play.